Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmaster
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenz999
Yup I did. I stand by that cos it's my opinion, which I have since learned from your good self that I'm not allowed since I'm a newbie. So I've been well and truly told off! 
We're not gonna agree on this so all we can do is agree to disagree I reckon. That sound fair to you? |
no it doesn't. if you're going to accuse me of misleading the forum you have to follow through with that.
the interviewer unequivocally called emma "A spoiled 19 year old brat". nowhere in the rest of the article does she contradict or deny this. she even says part of the reason she likes emma is because she is a brat. obviously the interviewer liking emma doesn't mean she's not a brat. |
Actually I think you'll find it does. If she also describes Emma as being polite, well-mannered etc then it shows she's not a brat ALL THE TIME. It shows she's a brat 'at times'. Now if you're seriously gonna tell me that people are either one thing or t'other, but not a mixture of things then fair enough, that's where our opinions differ.
But I see everyone as capable of being shitty at times, but on the whole most people are decent enough.
You seem (I stress *seem*) to be saying that if a person is capable of bratty behaviour, that makes them a permanant brat and therefore they can't possibly be down to earth or nice at any point. I disagree.
In a democracy people
are allowed to disagree. And it's okay. No biggie.